Drawing for PROGRESSIVE DUAL PRO-STIM

USPTO serial 77868802

PROGRESSIVE DUAL PRO-STIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE DUAL PRO-STIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Epps

JOSEPH EPPS EPPS YONG & COULSON, LLP333 S HOPE ST FL 35LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-1406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electromedical rehabilitative and pain management products for clinical and home use, namely, electrical nerve and muscle stimulators, ultrasonic stimulators, magnet therapy stimulators and laser therapy stimulatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 15, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 15, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 14, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 8, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 8, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance