Drawing for BOARD CERTIFIED IN BIOFEEDBACK

USPTO serial 77869148

BOARD CERTIFIED IN BIOFEEDBACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOARD CERTIFIED IN BIOFEEDBACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY E. LAMBERT

GARY E LAMBERT LAMBERT & ASSOCIATES92 STATE STREETSUITE 200BOSTON, MA 02109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Association services, namely, promoting the interests of and promoting the board certification of professions, practitioners, technicians, academics or therapists in biofeedback fieldsACTIVEJan 6, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 27, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 12, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 7, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2010GNR1NOTIFICATION OF DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2010GNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2010AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Mar 9, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 6, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 5, 2010EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance