USPTO serial 77869204
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Ce.A.S. S.r.l. Centro di Analisi Strutturale
Milan, IT
Other trademarks owned by Ce.A.S. S.r.l. Centro di Analisi Strutturale
Ce.A.S. S.r.l. Centro di Analisi Strutturale
Milan, IT
Other trademarks owned by Ce.A.S. S.r.l. Centro di Analisi Strutturale
Ce.A.S. S.r.l. Centro di Analisi Strutturale
Milan, IT
Other trademarks owned by Ce.A.S. S.r.l. Centro di Analisi Strutturale
Astoria, NY
Astoria, NY
Astoria, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software program that performs engineering analysis and design of deep excavations, namely, of vertical wall structures that retain earth, ground water and adjacent structures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2011 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 1, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 24, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |