USPTO serial 77870411
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
91074 HERZOGENAURACH, DE
Other trademarks owned by SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
91074 HERZOGENAURACH, DE
Other trademarks owned by SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
Herzogenaurach, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly
Timothy J. Kelly Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto1290 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for remotely monitoring both environmental conditions and environmental controlling devices within a building, facility, grounds, or designated spatial area; environmentally friendly automation systems, namely, embedded computer operating systems and software, for monitoring internal machine conditions, namely, vibration, lubrication, torque, speed, and temperature; monitoring systems comprising wireless and wired controllers, controlled devices, namely, energy meters for tracking and monitoring energy usage, and software, for use in measuring vibration, torque, speed, thermographic and load monitoring in industrial applications, namely, cement processing, oil procurement, transportation and refining, petrochemical production, plastics manufacturing, steel production and processing, pulp and paper processing, mining, wind power generation, automotive manufacturing, water treatment, food manufacturing and processing, ethanol production, coal fire and nuclear power generation, and textile machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing environmentally friendly automation solutions, namely, site evaluations, control design analysis, and integrated installation using vibration, torque, speed, thermographic and load monitoring measurements; equipment monitoring services for others for tracking and reporting hardware processes and performance in the areas of cement processing, oil procurement, transportation and refining, petrochemical production, plastics manufacturing, steel production and processing, pulp and paper processing, mining, wind power generation, automotive manufacturing, water treatment, food manufacturing and processing, ethanol production, coal fire and nuclear power generation, and textile machinery; technical monitoring services for others in the areas of cement processing, oil procurement, transportation and refining, petrochemical production, plastics manufacturing, steel production and processing, pulp and paper processing, mining, wind power generation, automotive manufacturing, water treatment, food manufacturing and processing, ethanol production, coal fire and nuclear power generation, and textile machinery | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |