Drawing for EYEQ

USPTO serial 77870723

EYEQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EYEQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon P. Deppe

Jon P. Deppe Marsh Fischmann & Breyfogle LLP8055 E Tufts AvenueSuite 450Denver, CO 80237

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software platform for storing and hosting imagery, geospatial information, geospatial content, and location-specific information, and for accessing, downloading, analyzing, searching, organizing, sharing, distributing, updating, purchasing, integrating, and monitoring imagery, geospatial information, geospatial content, and location-specific informationACTIVE—
042software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software in the field of geospatial information and data, geocoding information, geographic information systems, satellite imagery, photogrammetry, mapping, location intelligence and location monitoring, namely, software for accessing, downloading, analyzing, searching, organizing, sharing, distributing, updating, purchasing, integrating, and monitoring imagery, geospatial information, geospatial content, and location-specific informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 1, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 2, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 31, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 31, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 29, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 24, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 24, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 1, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 6, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 6, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 16, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 8, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 8, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 24, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 12, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 6, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 5, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 4, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 18, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 17, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance