USPTO serial 77870915
LIFTINSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3967135Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2011
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIFTINSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1025 XE AMSTERDAM, NL
1025 XE AMSTERDAM, NL
1025 XE AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie E. Kretzschmer
Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of elevators, escalators and other technical apparatus and installations for transporting people and goods, in particular in the field of lift technology and safety relating thereto; Arranging professional workshop and training courses; Arranging and conducting educational conferences; publishing of books, journals, educational papers and online magazines; consultation relating to any of the foregoing, also provided through the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 21, 2011 |
| 042 | Scientific research in the field of lifting technologies and lifting apparatus such as elevators, escalators and all kinds of technological apparatus for transporting and lifting goods and people; Technological consultation in the technology field of lifting technologies and lifting apparatus such as elevators, escalators and all kinds of technological apparatus for transporting and lifting goods and people; industrial design in the field of lifting technologies and lifting apparatus such as elevators, escalators and all kinds of technological apparatus for transporting and lifting goods and people; inspections of elevators, escalators and other technical apparatus and installations for transporting people and goods, in particular in the field of lift technology and safety relating thereto; Testing, analysis and evaluation of the elevators, escalators and other technical apparatus and installations of others for transporting people and goods for the purpose of certification; technical research in the field of lifting technologies and lifting apparatus such as elevators, escalators and all kinds of technological apparatus for transporting and lifting goods and people; consultation relating to any of the foregoing, also provided through the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 21, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liftinstituut Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Liftinstituut Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Liftinstituut Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LIFTINSTITUTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 24, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |