USPTO serial 77871671
LUXURY HEALTH. REDEFINED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUXURY HEALTH. REDEFINED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEWPORT COAST, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WALTER A. HACKLER, Ph.D.
WALTER A. HACKLER, PH.D. PATENT LAW OFFICE2372 SE BRISTOL ST STE BNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-0755UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Prophylactic and therapeutic preparations to prevent and treat infectious diseases and related disorders, homeopathic common cold preparation which reduces the duration and severity of the common cold, natural health food supplements, namely, health food supplements from herbal sources which are in the form of ground or dry product, in solution or as an extract of herbal sources dietary supplements, herbal supplements, mineral supplements, vitamins and vitamin formulations, vitamin supplement for people in crowded environments, which are potentially germ-infested, vitamin and mineral preparations for use as ingredients in the food and pharmaceutical industry, vitamins and mineral, herbal, and nutrition supplements, natural pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of vitamin deficiencies and food supplements primarily based on active ingredients and extracts for nutritional purposes | ACTIVE | Jan 18, 2011 |
| 021 | Personal dispensers for dispensing pills, namely, prophylactic and therapeutic preparations, for domestic use | ACTIVE | Jan 18, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PORTNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PORTNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named LUXURY HEALTH. REDEFINED
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |