USPTO serial 77872489
PEERLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEERLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel N. Smith
Daniel N. Smith New England Patent & Trademark301 Edgewater Place, Suite 100Wakefield, MA 01880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, surgical clips, surgical clip applicators; Medical and surgical devices, namely, hand-held electrosurgical instruments, namely, loops, laparoscopic surgical scissors, forceps, cutting forceps, debrider instruments for the cutting and/or coagulating of tissue, dissectors and needle electrodes, larynoscopes, introducing stylets, multifunctional shaped stylet, focusing diopter correctors, endoscopic instruments, bipolar coagulating probes, flexible and rigid hysteroscopes and resectoscopes, cystoscope tips, fiberoptic light guides for medical use; laparoscopic systems comprising laparoscopes and accessory devices therefore; choledochoscopes, electrosurgical generators, needle trocar/cannula, band applicators for tubal ligation, tubal ligation apparatus, band applicator with trocar, laprocator applicators and bipolar forceps, biopsy instruments, electrosurgical apparatus, graspers and forceps for medical use; biopsy instruments, namely, scissors, dissectors and needle holders; probes, namely, spatula coagulation probes, insulated hook coagulation probes and insulted suction/coagulation probes; guide rods for medical use, microinstruments for medical use, namely, forceps, scissors, biopsy forceps, irrigation-aspiration cannula, palpation probes, and balloon retractors; cholangiography instruments, namely, aspiration needles, clip applicators, myoma screws, uterine manipulators/injectors, reducers, seals, cystourethroscopes, nephroscopes, fiberoptic light guides, laser bridges, examining bridges, spacers, cysto-resectoscope adapters, urethrotomes, pediatric cystoscopes, suprapubic tractors, evacuators, cystoscopes, tips, seals, ureteroscopes, flat-wire baskets and stone retrieval devices; rigid and flexible endoscopes for use during diagnostic and surgical procedures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 13, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |