CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PHONE FOR THE CURE

USPTO serial 77873294

PHONE FOR THE CURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHONE FOR THE CURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Cone

JOHN M. CONE HITCHCOCK EVERT LLPPO BOX 131709DALLAS, TX 75313-1709UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036charitable fundraising servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 18, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 14, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 12, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 14, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 14, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 1, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 23, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 23, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 23, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance