USPTO serial 77874503
SNATCH MAGNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNATCH MAGNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEST COVINA, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Admission ticket reservation and booking services for night clubs and night club events; Arranging and conducting of concerts; Arranging and conducting special events; Audio and video recording services; Audio recording and production; Book publishing; Booking of seats for shows and booking of theatre tickets; Composition of music for others; Concert booking; Consultation and advice regarding musical selections and arrangements for sound recordings and live performances; Consultation and advice regarding the rental of recording studios and venues; Editing or recording of sounds and images; Entertainment and education services in the nature of live dance and musical performances; Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing advice and information for music, video and film concept and script development; Entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical band; Entertainment in the nature of live radio personality performances; Entertainment in the nature of live stage performances in the nature of concerts or lecture for hire in the field of music by an individual; Entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical group; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials featuring a musical group; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring a musical group; Entertainment, namely, live music concerts; Entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band; Fan clubs; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Music composition and transcription for others; Music composition for others; Music production services; Music publishing services; Music video production; Organizing and arranging exhibitions for entertainment purposes; Production of audio recording; Production of musical sound recording; Record master production; Record mastering; Record production; Song writing services | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2011 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |