USPTO serial 77875179
ZERO LATENCY ENGINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZERO LATENCY ENGINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
88090 Immenstaad, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nina Shreve and Andrea Pelaez
NINA SHREVE AND ANDREA PELAEZ FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO1290 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 17NEW YORK, NY 10104-3800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and hardware for supply, use and administration of software applications and data via computer networks and/or to distant users; software and hardware for the access to and use of decentralized computer systems, networks and software applications; computer software and hardware for administration, control and examination of computer systems; software and hardware for backup and/or to code data communication; software and hardware which gives common access to multiple users and allows collaboration regarding application and information; software and hardware for the use of thin-client/server-computer, namely operating system software, which facilitates the access to applications in a company network and the worldwide computer network; computer programs; data-proceeding apparatus and computer; apparatus and instruments for the conducting; switching, transforming, accumulating, regulation or controlling electricity, modems; telecommunication transmitters | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Satellite transmission; transmission of virtual client/ server computer application, initialization of the access to a worldwide computer network, services for lines, routing and connections for data communication, voice transfer via satellite, video transmission via satellite, data transmission via satellite | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy for telecommunication techniques, drafting and planning of data networks; data administration of servers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |