USPTO serial 77875705
RXSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RXSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig Barker
CRAIG BARKER LAW OFFICE OF CRAIG BARKER, P.C.48 EAST AVEAUSTIN, TX 78701-4317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consultation, namely, assisting pharmacies in negotiating pricing and reimbursement levels, dispensing fees and other contractual terms with pharmacy benefit managers; assisting pharmacies in negotiating pricing with pharmaceutical wholesalers. Providing claim reconciliation services in the nature of insurance/payor claims auditing information to pharmacies pertaining to payments from insurance carriers and other payors via a worldwide communications network | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2004 |
| 036 | Providing pharmacy benefit management services to employer groups and others; providing financial consulting services to pharmacies and others; providing prescription claims aggregation services to pharmacies. Providing information in the field of insurance plan information all via a global computer network; insurance consultation services, namely, pre-screening pharmacy claims for compliance with insurance plan requirements; insurance management services, namely, insurance plan reconciliation and factoring for others | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 30, 2011 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |