USPTO serial 77875733
NUWAVE HEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUWAVE HEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig Barker
CRAIG BARKER LAW OFFICE OF CRAIG BARKER, P.C.48 EAST AVEAUSTIN, TX 78701-4317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Arranging of managed care contractual services in the fields medical and pharmaceutical care. Managed care services, namely, utilization review and pre-certification services and electronic processing of health care information. Consulting services, namely, to employers, community organizations, brokers and beneficiaries, related to consumer information regarding health care plan options, products and programs in the field of managed care and state and federal medical care programs | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2007 |
| 036 | Administration of employee benefit plans concerning healthcare insurance, namely, medical and pharmaceutical insurance. Advisory services in the field of employee benefits for group healthcare insurance offered to employees, namely, medical and pharmaceutical insurance. Providing pharmaceutical benefit management services. Providing counseling and consulting in the field of healthcare benefits. Providing prescription claims aggregation services to pharmacies. Providing information in the field of insurance plan information all via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 30, 2011 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |