Drawing for AXXESS LM

USPTO serial 77876641

AXXESS LM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AXXESS LM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc M. Gorelnik

Marc M. Gorelnik Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, stents for the treatment of vascular, esophageal, trachael and biliary duct bifurcationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 1, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 28, 2011CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 23, 2011EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 26, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 14, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Nov 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance