USPTO serial 77876704
RUGGEDCELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUGGEDCELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann Lamport Hammitte
ANN LAMPORT HAMMITTE LANDO & ANASTASI, LLP1 MAIN STCAMBRIDGE, MA 02142-1531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software, namely, an embedded operating system for computers, managed Ethernet switches, routers andlor serial devices servers forming a network; computer software, namely, an operating system for computers, managed Ethernet switches, routers and/or serial device servers connected to a network; computer software for visualizing a computer network; computer software for discovering devices connected to a computer network; communication routers, switches, computers and modems; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; fiber optic cables, connectors and filters; fiber optical networks comprised primarily of hubs, computer switches and fiber-to-electrical media converters, communication hubs, communication routers and switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; computer network hubs, computer switches and routers having fiber optical ports; computer hubs, routers and computer switches having mixed fiber optical and electrical media ports; fiber optical Ethernet networks comprised of communication hubs, switches, fiber-to-electrical media converters, serial to Ethernet servers, communication hubs, communication routers, computer hubs, computer network routers, computer switches and serial to Ethernet servers having mixed fiber optic to electrical media ports; computer network hubs, switches and routers having optical ports; computer hubs, routers, switches, serial to Ethernet computer servers and serial device computer servers having mixed fiber optic and copper ports; video encoders; fiber optic to cable converters; fiber optical to electrical media converters; serial to Ethernet gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware; serial device computer servers | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; online retail store featuring communication routers, switches, gateways, computers, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks; retail store services featuring fiber optical networks, routers, switches, gateways, modems, fiber optic cables, connectors and filters, fiber optical networks, fiber optical Ethernet networks, computer hardware, computer software and communication equipment; arranging and conducting commercial exhibitions of fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment for retail purpose on communication media; providing on-line business information services in the field of the commercial uses of fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications equipment; sales promotion services featuring fiber optical networks, computer hardware, computer software and communications; telecommunications network management services, namely, the operation and administration of telecommunication systems and networks for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; computer diagnostic services for network system; computer network design for others; computer network consulting services; design, deployment and management of computer networks for others; computer communication network consulting services; monitoring of computer network systems for system failure or decrease in performance; monitoring of the performance and physical structure of a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer network systems for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RUGGEDCOM INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named RUGGEDCELL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |