Drawing for AMBUSH

USPTO serial 77877263

AMBUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMBUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Arrett

RICHARD A ARRETT VIDAS ARRETT & STEINKRAUS PA6640 SHADY OAK RDSTE 400EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344-7700

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Hunting blinds; Treestands for huntingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 26, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 25, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 25, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 7, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 5, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 5, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 5, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance