USPTO serial 77877347
HOLLYWOOD QUALITY VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2011
- Examiner
- BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOLLYWOOD QUALITY VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
San Jose, CA
Other trademarks owned by Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Christopher Norton
N. Christopher Norton Arent Fox LLP1717 K St., NWWashington, DC 20006-5344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS, SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORIES; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMMUNICATIONS SERVERS; VIDEO DISPLAY CARDS; DIGITAL SIGNAL IMAGE PROCESSORS; PROJECTORS, NAMELY, CINEMATOGRAPHIC PROJECTORS, PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECTORS, MULTIMEDIA PROJECTORS, AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY PROJECTORS; IMAGE FILTERS, NAMELY, OPTICAL AND CAMERA FILTERS; ELECTRONIC AND OPTICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING HARDWARE, NAMELY, CABLES, SWITCHES, SCALERS, INTERCONNECTORS, AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS; COMPUTER ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT ELECTRICAL PLUGS; POWER SUPPLIES; DIGITAL CAMERAS; AUDIOVISUAL RECEIVERS; AUDIOVISUAL TRANSMITTERS; AUDIOVISUAL RECORDERS; AUDIOVISUAL PLAYERS; DIGITAL AUDIO-VIDEO RECEIVERS; DIGITAL AUDIO-VIDEO TRANSMITTERS; DIGITAL AUDIO-VIDEO RECORDERS; DIGITAL AUDIO-VIDEO PLAYERS; DVD RECORDERS AND PLAYERS; HIGH DEFINITION VIDEO PLAYERS, HD DVD PLAYERS; TELEVISIONS; LCD PANELS; PLASMA DISPLAY PANELS; MP3 PLAYERS; DIGITAL ENCODERS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; CELL, DIGITAL AND MOBILE PHONES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Device Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HOLLYWOOD QUALITY VIDEO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 6, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |