USPTO serial 77879012
M3
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3896218Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2010
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with M3?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard M. Gitten
HOWARD M. GITTEN EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE LLPPO BOX 130NEW YORK, NY 10150-0130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Personal monitoring device, namely, a portable GPS-enabled transmitter that transmits voice and location data to a base station receiver; an electronic base station transmitter and receiver for sending and receiving voice and location data to a monitoring center ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2009 |
| 045 | [ Emergency response alarm monitoring services, namely, monitoring of alert devices by a remote monitoring center for the dispatch of emergency public health and security services and notification to third parties ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrity Tracking, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Integrity Tracking, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Integrity Tracking, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named M3
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2012 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| May 18, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |