USPTO serial 77879222
MALINDA LUCCASIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MALINDA LUCCASIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, PLLCPO BOX 1364FAIRFAX, VA 22038-1364UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Dress suits, Men's suits, Dresses, Gowns, Skirts, Pants, Trousers, maternity dresses, Children's and infant's apparel, namely, jumpers, overall sleepwear, pajamas, rompers and one-piece garments, Down jackets, Leisure suits, Body suits, Greatcoats, Coats, Jackets, Mantles, Mantillas, Shawls, Cloaks, Athletic uniforms, Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms, Leather coats, Leather jackets, Liveries, Women's suits, Dresses, Women's ceremonial dresses, sun sleeves, Men's suits, Jeans, Clothing, namely, shirts, Cuffs, Wristbands, Detachable collar, Cotton wadded jacket, Chinese jacket, Chinese style close-fitting skirt, Costumes for use in role-playing games, Wedding dresses, Wedding gowns, Wedding Veils, Clothing, namely, folk costumes, Evening dresses, Shoes, Women's shoes, Men's shoes, Sandals, shoes, Sandals and beach shoes, Slippers, Beach shoes, Canvas shoes, Leather shoes, Wooden shoes, Wooden clogs, Athletic shoes, Leisure shoes, Infants' shoes, Insoles, shoes for children, boots, Overshoes, Scarves, neckerchiefs, Kerchiefs, Silk scarves, Stoles, Headbands, Hoods, Bandanas, Veils, Collar protectors, Mufflers, Neckties, Scarves, Neckwear, Ties, Cravats, Bow ties, Pocket squares, Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms, Ear muffs, Hats, Headgear, namely, hats, caps, Berets, Socks, Stockings, Pantyhose, Sock suspenders, Suspenders, Braces, Anklets, Gloves, Gloves as clothing, Mittens, Waistbands, Waist belts, Belts, Belts for clothing, Girdles, Leather belts, Sashes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale and retail store services featuring clothing, shoes, and jewelry; wholesale distributorships featuring clothing, shoes, and jewelry; retail shoe stores; retail apparel stores; retail clothing boutiques; retail clothing stores; and retail jewelry stores | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT CROWN INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by GREAT CROWN INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MALINDA LUCCASIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |