USPTO serial 77880442
BASE TO PEAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4292639Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 19, 2013
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BASE TO PEAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph F. Murphy, Jr.
JOSEPH F. MURPHY, JR. Law Office of Joseph F. Murphy, Jr.Suite 2367; 101 West 23rd StreetNEW YORK, NY 10011UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Business training; Training services in the field of training in leadership and crisis management; Educating at university or colleges; Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, conferences, tutoring, and mentoring in the field of training in leadership and crisis management; Educational services, namely, providing courses of instructions at the secondary and college level; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction in the field of training in leadership and crisis management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 21, 2012 |
| 045 | Consulting services in the field of national security; Providing information regarding understanding and preventing terrorism; Military science services, namely, analyzing war strategies; Providing information in the field of the military, military tactics and strategies; Consultation services concerning homeland safety and security issues; Providing information concerning homeland safety and security issues | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 21, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lippold, Kirk Staheli
- Other trademarks owned by Lippold, Kirk Staheli
- Other trademarks owned by Lippold, Kirk Staheli
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BASE TO PEAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 19, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 12, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |