Drawing for ICUTE

USPTO serial 77881406

ICUTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ICUTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Aprons; Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Belts; Bib overalls; Bib tights; Bibs not of paper; Boots; Boots for sport; Bow ties; Cloth bibs for use by senior citizens or physically- or mentally-challenged persons; Cloth diapers; Coats; Gloves; Hats; Infant diaper covers; Men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Men's suits, women's suits; Muffs; Pants; Parts of clothing, namely, gussets for tights, gussets for stockings, gussets for bathing suits, gussets for underwear, gussets for leotards and gussets for footlets; Raincoats; Scarfs; Scientific and technological apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, uniforms; Sneakers; Socks and stockings; Suits; Suspender belts; Textile diapers; Toe boxes; Toe caps; Trousers; UnderwearACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2011PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Nov 29, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2010PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Sep 30, 2010PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Sep 30, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Sep 29, 2010PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 29, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 2, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 1, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 1, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance