USPTO serial 77882339
PRIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lindsey N. Rothrock
LINDSEY N ROTHROCK BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLPONE AMERICAN SQUARESUITE 2300INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282-0018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Seed and soil inoculants, namely, biological enzymes and microorganisms designed to promote plant growth, for agricultural and horticultural use, excluding seed and soil inoculants for turfs | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 2, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |