USPTO serial 77882565
MOSTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LIWINSKI, HELENE AGNES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOSTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hsin Tien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raphael A. Gutierrez
RAPHAEL A. GUTIERREZ JACKSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP, PLLC106 STARVALE LNSHIPMAN, VA 22971-2119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEPHONE INTERCOMS; CAR PHONES; WIRED INTERCOMS; TELEPHONE INTERCOMS WITH LCD DISPLAY; CELL PHONES; MOBILE PHONES; VIDEO PHONES; MOBILE PHONE CRADLES WITH MOUNTING MECHANISMS; RADIO RECEIVERS; POWER AMPLIFIERS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS); STEREO SIGNAL GENERATORS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) RECEIVERS; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM (GPS) TRANSMITTERS; SATELLITE SIGNAL RECEIVERS; WIRELESS HANDS-FREE CAR COMMUNICATION KITS, NAMELY, CALL DETECTORS, HEADSETS, TRANSCEIVERS, AND COMMUNICATION VEHICLE ADAPTERS FOR RECEIVING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | ACTIVE | Oct 28, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |