USPTO serial 77883268
SKATE TRASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKATE TRASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA CRUZ, CA
Santa Cruz, CA
Santa Cruz, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Bags and cases specially adapted for holding or carrying portable telephones and telephone equipment and accessories; cases for spectacles and sunglasses; computer bags; computer carrying cases; computer game programs; computer game software; computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; computer game software focusing on achieving a set of goals, positions, ownership, and credentials, and professional and social status, and good fortune necessary to succeed professionally and personally, and not referring either to a group of software for use in commerce or to a group of offices; computer game software for personal computers and home video game consoles; computer game software for use with personal computers, home video game consoles used with televisions, and for arcade-based video game consoles; computer programs for video and computer games; decorative magnets; decorative refrigerator magnets; digital trading cards in the nature of multimedia software recorded on magnetic media featuring information in the field of skateboarding; downloadable computer game programs; downloadable electronic game programs; electronic game programs; electronic game software; electronic game software for cellular telephones; electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; electronic game software for wireless devices; electronic interactive board games for use with external monitor; game software; games adapted for use with television receivers; hand-held electronic games adapted for use with television receivers only; hand-held units for playing electronic games for use with external display screen or monitor; interactive game programs; interactive game software; interactive multimedia computer game program; interactive video game programs; interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware for use with an external monitor and software; magnetic cards; magnetic coded gift cards; messenger bags especially adapted for holding laptops; mousepads; protective carrying cases specially adapted for video game consoles for use with an external display screen or monitor; sunglasses; video and computer game programs; video game cartridges and discs; video game discs; video game interactive control floor pads or mats; video game software; virtual reality game software | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 21, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |