USPTO serial 77883806
QUEENZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUEENZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Perth Amboy, NJ
Perth Amboy, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of dance performances; Entertainment in the nature of live performances by recording artist(s); Entertainment in the nature of live radio personality performances; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, namely, musical band, rock group, gymnastic, dance, and ballet performances; Entertainment in the nature of live performance by recording artist(s); Entertainment information services, namely, providing information and news releases about a musical artist; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment services, namely, an on-line activity where you create your own music videos; Entertainment services, namely, dance events by a recording artist; Entertainment services, namely, non-downloadable ring tones, pre-recorded music, video and graphics presented to mobile communications devices via a global computer network and wireless networks; Entertainment services, namely, performing and competing in motor sports events; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials featuring recording artist(s); Entertainment services, namely, providing information about a recording artist via an online network; Entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable playback of music via global communications networks; Entertainment services, namely, providing nondownloadable prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of recording artist's music; Entertainment services, namely, the presentation of live Christmas musical productions; Entertainment, namely, live music concerts. Entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical band; Entertainment, namely, live performances by musical bands; Entertainment, namely, live performances by rock groups; Hosting a back to school event in a shopping center featuring prizes, games, music, and a fashion show; Live performances featuring prerecorded vocal and instrumental performances viewed on a big screen; Modeling for artists; Multimedia entertainment services in the nature of recording, production and post-production services in the fields of music, video, and films; Multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; Music production services; Music publishing services; Music selection services for use in television, film, radio and video games; Music video production; Post-production editing services in the field of music, videos and film; Production of musical sound recording; Production of sound and music video recordings; Providing a database featuring information about artists; Providing a website featuring information about artistic styles; Radio entertainment services, namely, radio programs featuring performances by a recording artist; Rental of musical instruments. Rental of phonographic and music recordings | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |