USPTO serial 77883986
PURE NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4140618Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2012
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURE NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Petach Tikva 49277, IL
Petach Tikva 49277, IL
Petach Tikva 49277, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F. William McLaughlin
F. WILLIAM MCLAUGHLIN WOOD PHILLIPS500 W MADISON ST STE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661-2562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | breakfast cereals, cereal-based snack foods, processed cereals, oatmeal; snacks, namely, granola snacks, cereal based snack foods, corn based snacks, pretzels; bakery products, namely, cookies, cakes, muffins, scones, pastries, bread, crackers, biscuits, wafers; pancakes; granola; sandwiches; croutons, soup nuts, soup crackers; noodles, macaroni, spaghetti; confectionery, namely, chewing gum, bubble gum, candy, candy mints and marshmallows; mayonnaise, ketchup, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spices; tea | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 15, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |