Drawing for SIMAG

USPTO serial 77884027

SIMAG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GALAN, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMAG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Zachary A. Aria

ZACHARY A. ARIA BLANK ROME LLP1 LOGAN SQ FL 8PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011ice cube making and dispensing machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 26, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 15, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 31, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 23, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 23, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance