USPTO serial 77884122
SAORSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAORSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carson City, NV
Carson City, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Dort
DAVID DORT DORT PATENT, P.C.119 S SAINT ASAPH ST STE 200ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer operating software; Computer software for administration of computer networks; Computer software for encryption; Computer software for the creation of firewalls; Computer software for use in the encryption and decryption of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Computer software for use in the safeguarding of digital files, including audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files; Computer software to automate data warehousing; Electronic encryption units; LAN (local area network) operating software; Network access server operating software; Software for ensuring the security of electronic mail; Software for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems; Software for the operational management of portable magnetic and electronic cards; USB (universal serial bus) operating software; VPN (virtual private network) operating software; WAN (wide area network) operating software; Software for assisting business in process flow changes, namely, data analysis software for improving data processing and storage; software for custom modification of an information technology system, namely, data analysis and transformation software; software for handling data mismatches, namely data analysis, standardization and transformation; software for assisting companies in mergers and acquisitions, namely, transforming and merging data belonging to multiple entities; software for dynamic variable record sizing, namely, data transformation and normalization; software for implementing business process changes namely, standardizing and integrating data with different standards and protocols; software for legacy system integration, namely, integrating data from legacy systems into current systems; software for implementing artificial intelligence for use in data transformation and management; software enabling data evolution, namely, allowing data of different standards to be integrated; software for complex manufacturing automation, namely, transforming data and manufacturing process of different standards into a standard format; computer software and computer hardware for hard-drive protection, name, data encryption and data protection; computer software and computer hardware in the form of a solid-state memory device for hard-drive protection; software for merging data and for integrated data reports; software for small, medium or large-scale data and application integrations, namely, data standardization and normalization across multiple platforms and standards; software for data compression | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2014 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |