USPTO serial 77884874
KINECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N. Makous
DAVID N. MAKOUS LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2663UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephone apparatus, receivers and transmitters, microphones, headsets, speakers; electronic interface modules for wired and wireless interface of mobile phones and electronic media players with an automotive electrical system; Vehicle-based electronic module for transmitting vehicle diagnostic information via a computer network and parts therefor; vehicle-based electronic module for transmitting vehicle status information to emergency personnel and parts therefor; vehicle-based electronic module for receiving traffic status information and providing directional guidance information in response thereto and parts therefor; motor vehicle diagnostic system comprised of a vehicle-based electronic module for transmitting vehicle diagnostic information via a computer network and parts therefor; motor vehicle diagnostic system comprised of a vehicle-based electronic module for transmitting vehicle status information to emergency personnel and parts therefor; motor vehicle system comprised of a vehicle-based electronic module for receiving traffic status information and providing directional guidance information in response thereto and parts therefore; in-vehicle multipurpose communication system | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services; telephone communication services; transmission services; message sending; providing telecommunication services to a computer network; providing access to data bases; transmission of motor vehicle diagnostic information via a computer network; transmission of motor vehicle status information to emergency personnel; transmitting vehicle diagnostic information via a computer network; transmitting vehicle status information to emergency personnel; receiving traffic status information and providing directional guidance information in response thereto; providing traffic status information to a motor vehicle to provide directional guidance information to the motor vehicle operator in response thereto; in-vehicle multipurpose communication system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |