USPTO serial 77885674
RESIZE YOUR THINKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RESIZE YOUR THINKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret M. Powers
MARGARET M. POWERS SHAY GLENN LLP2755 CAMPUS DR STE 210SAN MATEO, CA 94403-2545UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Component parts for machines in the nature of micro electro-mechanical or MEMS devices, systems and components, and other devices, systems and components having micro-scale or millimeter scale features, comprised of mechanical, electrical, optical, or fluidic elements or any combination thereof, namely, gears, springs, blades, needles and threads | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Mechanical component parts for use in semiconductor testing equipment in the nature of micro electro-mechanical or MEMS devices, systems and components, and other devices, systems and components having micro-scale or millimeter scale features, comprised of mechanical, electrical, optical, or fluidic elements or any combination thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical equipment in the nature of micro electro-mechanical or MEMS devices, systems and components, and other devices, systems and components having micro-scale or millimeter scale features, comprised of mechanical, electrical, optical, or fluidic elements or any combination thereof, namely, surgical instruments and integral component parts therefor, instruments for minimally invasive surgery and integral component parts therefor, surgical and medical instruments for use in implantation procedures and integral component parts therefor, and integral component parts for drug delivery systems; surgical and medical implant devices, for neural, vascular and skeletal purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Integral component parts for munitions having micro-scale or millimeter scale features that are comprised of mechanical, electrical, optical, or fluidic elements or any combination thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of products to order and specification of others in the nature of micro electro-mechanical or MEMS devices, systems and components, and other devices, systems and components having micro-scale or millimeter scale features, comprised of mechanical, electrical, optical, or fluidic elements, or any combination thereof, namely, devices used in semiconductor test equipment, mechanical component parts, munitions components, surgical instruments, instruments for minimally invasive surgery, surgical and medical implant devices, component parts for all of the aforesaid goods, and components for drug delivery systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Microfabrica Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Microfabrica Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named RESIZE YOUR THINKING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |