Drawing for LIVE-FI

USPTO serial 77885870

LIVE-FI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVE-FI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

Terrence J. McAllister Ohlandt, Greeley, Ruggiero & Perle, LLPOne Landmark Square10th FloorStamford, CT 06901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Consultation and advice regarding musical selections and arrangements for sound recordings and live performances; Entertainment services, namely, multimedia production services; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts and webcasts in the fields of music, videos, film, live performances by musical groups or singers, play-by-play sports contest broadcasts; Mobile media and entertainment services in the nature of content preparation, production and post-productionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 15, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 15, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 8, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 18, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 13, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 13, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 12, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 9, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 9, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jun 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 16, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 14, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 14, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 31, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 7, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance