USPTO serial 77886279
VERSUS LOCATING ADVANTAGES FOR HEALTHCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4365010Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 9, 2013
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VERSUS LOCATING ADVANTAGES FOR HEALTHCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Delaney
Matthew D. Delaney FROST BROWN TODD LLC301 E 4TH ST3300 GREAT AMERICAN TWRCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) LOCATING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF INFRARED SENSORS, INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY COLLECTORS, INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY CONCENTRATORS, INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY TRANSMITTING BADGES AND INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY TAGS; INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) CREDENTIALS, NAMELY, CARDS AND TAGS, AND READERS FOR INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIALS; COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR REMOTELY TRACKING, MANAGING, MONITORING AND LOCATING PEOPLE AND EQUIPMENT INSIDE A BUILDING AND IN HEALTHCARE APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 25, 2013 |
| 037 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING IN THE NATURE OF THE REPAIR OF COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) LOCATING SYSTEMS AND INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) LOCATING SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 2011 |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE OF INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) LOCATING SYSTEMS AND RELATED HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 2011 |
| 042 | TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS FOR INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) LOCATING SYSTEMS AND INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INFRARED AND RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) LOCATING SYSTEMS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VERSUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VERSUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VERSUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VERSUS LOCATING ADVANTAGES FOR HEALTHCARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |