USPTO serial 77888299
BIZPAC 3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIZPAC 3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Greenville, SC
Greenville, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Lancaster
ROBERT G. LANCASTER BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N BROADWAY STE 3600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102-2769UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telephone communications services; telecommunication access services; telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of voice, messages and data; telecommunication services, namely, information transmission via electronic communications networks; electronic mail and messaging services; voice mail services; voice over IP services; provision of access to the Internet; providing technical consultation in the fields of telecommunications, telecommunications networks, telecommunications transmission, and telecommunication network security; and providing information about telecommunication | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting web-sites of others on computer servers; technical consultation in the field of computer networks and computer network security; computer services, namely, data recovery services; hosting of digital content on the Internet; application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; application service provider (ASP) services featuring software for use in telecommunications, data backup and storage, data encryption, computer security and network security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |