Drawing for SIERRA WHITE

USPTO serial 77888783

SIERRA WHITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIERRA WHITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Schulte

CHRISTOPHER J SCHULTE MERCHANT AND GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019granite, cut stone, dimensional stone, slabs of granite, and monumental stoneACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 7, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 7, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 24, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 28, 2011RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES
Apr 8, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Apr 8, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Feb 9, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 2, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Dec 2, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Nov 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 5, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 5, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 5, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 16, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance