Drawing for HIGH VIZ TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 77888939

HIGH VIZ TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3786481Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 4, 2010
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIGH VIZ TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THOMAS THIBAULT

Thomas Thibault THIBAULT PATENT GROUPPO Box 722112SAN DIEGO, CA 92172UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Pet toysSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2014C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL
Dec 10, 2014C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED
Dec 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 26, 2014ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2014PRA7REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED
Dec 19, 2013PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7
Dec 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 12, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2011AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED
Jun 4, 2011COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Apr 28, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 28, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 27, 2011ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED
May 4, 2010R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 11, 2010CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Mar 11, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 11, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Mar 11, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 10, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 11, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance