Drawing for ECO

USPTO serial 77889703

ECO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William A. Meehan

William A. Meehan Slutsky, McMorris & Meehan, LLP396 Danbury RoadWilton, CT 06897UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools, namely, portable electro-magnetic drilling machines using annular cutters for use in drilling steelACTIVEMar 31, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 11, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 9, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 1, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 1, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 11, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance