Drawing for GOFIGURE

USPTO serial 77891144

GOFIGURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOFIGURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Optican Herman and Jennifer C. Bailey

Joan Optican Herman and Jennifer C. Bailey Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000Overland Park, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of information management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and webpages in the field of information collection, arrangement, presentation, publication and storageACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jan 31, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 29, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 29, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Jul 20, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 17, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2012PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED
Feb 23, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Feb 4, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Feb 3, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jan 31, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 31, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2012TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Aug 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 15, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 1, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 1, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 1, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 1, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 1, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 1, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 18, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 17, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 15, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance