Drawing for A SOURCE OF TRUST

USPTO serial 77892774

A SOURCE OF TRUST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A SOURCE OF TRUST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Cox

KATHRYN E. COX LANE & WATERMAN LLP220 N MAIN ST STE 600DAVENPORT, IA 52801-1987UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed publications, namely, newspapers for general circulation; magazines featuring information of interest to women; magazines featuring information of interest to mature adults, booklets featuring dozens of restaurant menus; photographsACTIVEFeb 21, 2009
041services consisting of providing non-downloadable electronic publications featuring general and local news, and information of interest to specific geographical areas; electronic publications of local sports news and information; electronic publication of specialized woman's magazine; electronic publication of specialized mature adult's magazine; electronic publication of restaurant menus in a specific geographical area; electronic publication of jobs available in a specific geographical area; electronic publication featuring automobiles in local inventory, automobile research, and automobile features; electronic publication featuring property for sale in a specific geographical area, including property map locations; electronic publication featuring determination of mortgage payments; presentation of audio, video, still and moving images and dataACTIVEFeb 21, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 18, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance