Drawing for TORRERO

USPTO serial 77893748

TORRERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TORRERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joanne Gillespie

91 LICHFIELD ROADMARKHAM, ON L3R0W9CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) Energy management system, namely, an electric motor, generator of electricity, electronic circuitry and control panel, sold as a kit, for monitoring and controlling the providing of propulsion energy proportional to user demands and for charging a battery, utilizing a source of renewable energy, namely, electric, wind, solar or hydrogen powerABANDONED—
012(Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Concept motor vehicles; (Based on Intent to Use) vehicles for locomotion on land, namely, passenger vehicles, namely, automobiles, vans, recreational vehicles, namely, all-terrain vehicles, sport utility vehicles, motorcycles, unicycles, bicycles, tricycles, scooters and mopeds and parts and fittings therefor, vehicles, namely, automobiles, vans, electrically powered assisted vehicles, namely, unicycles, bicycles, tricycles, golf carts, scooters, all-terrain vehicles, light and ultra light aircraft, motorcycles, motor scooters, mopeds and parts and fittings therefor excluding seating systems for transportation vehicles, namely, automotive vehicles and rail cars, mobility aids required for individuals with disabilities due to age, accident, or illness, namely, scooters; electric wheelchairs; recreational vehicles, namely, snowmobiles, personal watercraft, namely, small powerboats, personal jet boats, water scooters, and boatsABANDONEDFeb 24, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2013MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 6, 2013ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 6, 2013OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 2013OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 8, 2012OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 16, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 26, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 13, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Dec 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance