USPTO serial 77893748
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Aurora, Ontario, CA
Aurora, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Gillespie
91 LICHFIELD ROADMARKHAM, ON L3R0W9CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) Energy management system, namely, an electric motor, generator of electricity, electronic circuitry and control panel, sold as a kit, for monitoring and controlling the providing of propulsion energy proportional to user demands and for charging a battery, utilizing a source of renewable energy, namely, electric, wind, solar or hydrogen power | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Concept motor vehicles; (Based on Intent to Use) vehicles for locomotion on land, namely, passenger vehicles, namely, automobiles, vans, recreational vehicles, namely, all-terrain vehicles, sport utility vehicles, motorcycles, unicycles, bicycles, tricycles, scooters and mopeds and parts and fittings therefor, vehicles, namely, automobiles, vans, electrically powered assisted vehicles, namely, unicycles, bicycles, tricycles, golf carts, scooters, all-terrain vehicles, light and ultra light aircraft, motorcycles, motor scooters, mopeds and parts and fittings therefor excluding seating systems for transportation vehicles, namely, automotive vehicles and rail cars, mobility aids required for individuals with disabilities due to age, accident, or illness, namely, scooters; electric wheelchairs; recreational vehicles, namely, snowmobiles, personal watercraft, namely, small powerboats, personal jet boats, water scooters, and boats | ABANDONED | Feb 24, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |