USPTO serial 77894877
BIOGLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOGLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Geissler
SCOTT T WAKEMAN MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PLLC4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aromatics, namely, perfumes; beauty masks; bleaching preparations for cosmetics purposes; cosmetics; creams, namely, face cream, cosmetic cream, skin creams, beauty cream; deodorant for personal use; depilatories; depilatory preparations; extract of flowers, namely, perfumes, extracts of flowers sold as components of cosmetics; hair colorants; hair dyes; hair lotions; lipsticks; lotions, namely, beauty lotions, face lotions, skin lotions, body lotions, hand lotions; make up; make up removing preparations; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; oil for perfumes and scents; cosmetic pencils; eyebrow pencils; body talcum powder; shampoos; skin care, namely, non-medicated skin care preparations; soap; toiletries, namely, non-medicated toiletries; slimming gels and shower salt in the nature of bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes, all the foregoing goods not being for use on teeth or gums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2011 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |