USPTO serial 77895380
DAEDUCK GDS GLOBAL DIGITAL SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAEDUCK GDS GLOBAL DIGITAL SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Cole
THOMAS W. COLE ROBERTS MLOTKOWSKI SAFRAN & COLE P.C.7918 JONES BRANCH DR STE 500MC LEAN, VA 22102-3366UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | LED illuminators, namely illuminators used in backlight modules; LED lamps; LED lighting fixtures; LED light assemblies for street lights, signs, commercial lighting, automobiles, buildings, and other architectural uses; LED light bulbs; Flat panel lighting apparatus; Electric lamps; Electric light bulbs; Electric lighting fixture; Lamps; Lamp bases; Lamp reflectors; Lamp shades; Lampshade holders; Lighting tubes; Lights for use in illuminating signs and displays; Luminaries; Lighting apparatus for vehicles; Automotive headlamps | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services featuring electric lighting apparatus and devices, Retail services featuring electric lighting apparatus and devices, Commercial intermediary services in the field of electric lighting apparatus and devices, Arranging sales of electric lighting apparatus and devices; Wholesale store services featuring electric lamps, Retail store services featuring electric lamps, Commercial intermediary services in the field of electric lamps, Arranging sales of electric lamps, Wholesale store services featuring non-electric lighting apparatus and devices, Retail store services featuring non-electric lighting apparatus and devices, Commercial intermediary services in the field of non-electric lighting apparatus and devices, Arranging sales of non-electric lighting apparatus and devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |