USPTO serial 77896020
KUHN, IT'S MY STRENGTH!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KUHN, IT'S MY STRENGTH!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saverne, FR
Saverne, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural machines, namely, toothed harrows, rotary harrows, rotary tillers, ploughs, cultivators, pulverisers, stubble ploughs, soil mixers, weeders, soil decompactors, packer rollers; combination machines for working the soil in the nature of combined tilling and seed sowing machines; machine seed sowers and structural parts therefore; hay making machines in the nature of grass mowers, grass mower-conditioners, grass aerating-mowers, tedders, windrowers, combined grass tedders and windrowers, swath-gathering machines, swathturning machines; harvesting machines, namely, harvesters, combine harvesters, forage balers; agricultural machines, namely, treating machines in the nature of power operated sprayers; agricultural machines, namely, lawn mowers, shredders, brush cutters, conveyors, elevators, power operated straw-bedders; machines for preparing feed for cattle, namely silage unloaders, silage unloader-feeders; power operated spreaders, namely, fertilizer spreaders, manure spreaders; machines for excavating works; automotive machines for mowing, automotive machines for tedding, automotive machines for swathing, automotive machines for cutting plants; automotive agricultural tillers; automotive agricultural cultivators; automotive sowing machines; automotive combined earth-working and sowing machines; automotive machines for preparing feed for cattle, namely, automotive silage unloader mixer-feeders; automotive mixer-feeders; and structural replacement parts for the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Vehicles, namely, dump trucks, trucks for carrying freight, carts, vans, trailers, feeder-trailers, namely, trailers that also incorporate feeders; mixer-feeder trailers, namely, trailers that also incorporate mechanical mixers and feeders; tractors | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management; business administration; office functions; business information; bill-posting, namely, accounting; advertisement distribution; advertising documents, namely, design of advertising documents for others; sales promotion; publication of advertising texts; advertising mail, namely, design of advertising for mail distribution; advertising post, namely, direct mail advertising; radio advertisement; television advertisement; Internet advertisement; services provided in the field of retail business of agricultural machines, namely, retail store services featuring agricultural machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KUHN S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by KUHN S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named KUHN, IT'S MY STRENGTH!
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |