USPTO serial 77896056
GURU STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GURU STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E Lynn Perry
E. Lynn Perry Perry IP Group A.L.C.900 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRSte 226Larkspur, CA 94939Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines and books in the field of arts and entertainment; pre-recorded audio and video cassettes, compact discs, video discs, records and CD-ROMS, all of the foregoing featuring shows, movies, shorts, and videos in the field of drama, stories, cartoons, childhood education; interactive computer game software; computer software for creating, recording, editing and transmitting music and other audio and video material; computer software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing online chat rooms for social networking featuring information and news about entertainment; audio and video broadcasting services over the Internet or other communications network, namely, uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging and electronically transmitting information, audio, and video clips; providing information, audio, and video via websites, online forums, chat rooms, listservs and blogs over the Internet; providing on-line chat rooms and electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among users in the field of entertainment including animation | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Animation production and design services for others, namely, 3D CGI animation; animation design and consultation services with respect to character animation; special effects animation services for film and video; graphic design services; special effects animation services for film and video, namely, concept, design, and animation production services for TV identity and branding; entertainment services in the nature of development, broadcasting and film distribution of short form animation films and shows and long form animation series for television; producing original feature films, documentaries, music videos; multimedia publishing of books, magazines, journals, software, games, music, and electronic publications; computer software development; design, development and consulting services in the field of animation; operating a website featuring entertainment information about animation, animated shows, television series, movies, videos, and entertainment; nondownloadable computer software to enable uploading, posting, showing, displaying, tagging, blogging, sharing or otherwise providing electronic media or information over the Internet or other communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |