USPTO serial 77896531
AMERISURG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERISURG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathleen A. Rheintgen
KATHLEEN A. RHEINTGEN HUSCH BLACKWELL SANDERS LLP WELSH & KATZ120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ FL 22CHICAGO, IL 60606-3912UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and medical devices and instruments, namely, vascular vessel loops and clamp covers, forceps, needle holders, scissors, retractors, clamps, tracheostomy tubes, and surgical drapes; sterile equipment drapes; drainage bags for collection of bodily fluids; human face and body protectors, namely, masks and shields for use in the surgical, medical and dental fields; electric warming blankets and incorporated control devices for medical use; radiological apparatus for medical purposes; Surgical and medical tables, namely, patient examination, procedure and treatment tables and operating tables; Surgical and medical gynecological devices and instruments, namely, endocervical curettes, biopsy punches, tenaculum forceps, uterine dilators, endocervical speculum, parametrium clamps, and speculum; Surgical and medical devices and instruments used during laparoscopic surgery, namely, laparoscopic access ports, kittners, surgical tubing, specimen retrieval bags, verres needles, disposable electrodes, leep electrodes, endocervical curettes, biopsy punches, tenaculum forceps, uterine dilators, endocervical speculum, parametrium clamps, speculum, fiber-optic cable and retractors; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery, namely, chisels, rongeurs, osteotomes, gouges, retractors, elevators, levelers, hooks, curettes, suction tubes, pliers, and German wire and pin covers; Medical and surgical device and instrument cases, trays, racks, pans, bowls, basins, flat wire baskets and wire mesh baskets, and instrument stringers all for holding surgical instruments and devices during sterilization; microsurgical instrument cases and trays; prepackaged surgical and medical instrument trays, namely, routine dressing trays, dressing trays with suture removal instruments, incision and drainage trays, suture removal trays, wound closure instrument trays, biopsy trays, laparoscopic procedure trays, gynecological procedure trays, and orthopedic procedure trays; Medical and surgical device and instrument care and protection products, namely, instrument guards and protectors, instrument cassettes; ENT Baskets, namely, baskets containing instruments for use during ear, nose and throat surgical procedures | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic adhesive labels for labeling medical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Wallace Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Wallace Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named AMERISURG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |