USPTO serial 77898893
MERIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MERIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle Wirtner
MICHELLE WIRTNER SKLAR CORPORATION889 S MATLACK STWEST CHESTER, PA 19382-4971UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Biopsy instruments; Blunt curettes; Curettes; Dental dams; Dental excavators; Dental handpieces; Dental impression trays; Dental instruments for use in diagnostics, restorative dentistry, preventative dentistry, oral surgery; Dental instruments, namely, dental root files used in root canal therapy procedures; Dental instruments, namely, disposable prophy angles; Dental instruments, namely, prophy angles; Dental instruments, namely, calipers, pliers, forceps, explorers, knives, retractors, carvers, scissors, spatulas, rubber dam punches, filling instruments, rongeurs, scalers, burnishers; Dental picks; Dressing forceps; Electric scalpels; Forceps for dental technical purposes; Gynecological medical instruments for examining women' s reproductive organs; Knives for medical use; Knives for surgical purposes; Medical and surgical cutters for cutting human or animal tissue and organs; Medical and surgical knives and cutters for cutting human or animal tissue and organs; Medical and surgical knives for cutting human or animal tissue and organs; Medical instruments for use in performing biopsies; Scalpels; Scissors for surgery; Speculums; Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical, dental or veterinary use; Surgical apparatus and instruments for use in ophthalmic surgery; Surgical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopedic surgery; Surgical apparatus for use in ophthalmic surgery; Surgical blades; Surgical cutlery; Surgical devices and instruments; Surgical forceps; Surgical instruments, namely, scalpels, blades, knives, saws, scissors, forceps, retractors, curettes, handles, pliers; Surgical knives; Surgical perforators; Surgical pliers; Surgical retractors; Surgical scissors | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |