Drawing for FIDO'S FENCES

USPTO serial 77899695

FIDO'S FENCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORENO, PAUL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIDO'S FENCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad M. Behar

BRAD M BEHAR BRAD M BEHAR & ASSOCIATES PLLC94 SECOND STREETMINEOLA, NY 11501UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Retail outlet services in the field of electronic dog containment fencing systemsACTIVEAug 1, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 22, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 22, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 3, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 4, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 1, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 25, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 10, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance