Drawing for THE BUOY LINE

USPTO serial 77899840

THE BUOY LINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BUOY LINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam S. Taylor, Esq.

ADAM S. TAYLOR, ESQ. TAYLOR MCCORMACK & FRAME4 MILK ST STE 103PORTLAND, ME 04101-4164UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords and head straps which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 13, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2011IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2011INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Jan 5, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 30, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance