Drawing for CDA CU+

USPTO serial 77900321

CDA CU+

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CDA CU+?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Allan Fanucci

Allan Fanucci Winston & Strawn LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Association services, namely, promoting the interests of copper alloy manufacturers by raising public awareness of the antimicrobial properties of copper alloys for use in product design and building constructionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 2, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 25, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 6, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 1, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 31, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 26, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance