USPTO serial 77901646
ALEXANDER LOYD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMMEL, LAURA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALEXANDER LOYD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Anti-dazzle spectacles; Anti-glare glasses; Anti-glare spectacles; Antireflection coated eyeglasses; Cases for children's eye glasses; Cases for eyeglasses and sunglasses; Cases for spectacles and sunglasses; Cases for spectacles, for pince-nez and for contact lenses; Chains for eyeglasses; Chains for spectacles; Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; Children's eye glasses; Corrective glasses; Eye glass cases; Eye glass chains; Eye glass cords; Eye glasses; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass chains; Eyeglass chains and cords; Eyeglass cords; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglass retaining cords; Eyeglasses; Eyewear; Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords and head straps which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearer; Eyewear cases; Eyewear retainers; Field-glasses; Frames for eyeglasses and pince-nez; Frames for glasses and pince-nez; Frames for spectacles; Frames for spectacles and pince-nez; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Glacier eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for cutting drilling, marking, engraving and shaping optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for drilling optical lenses for eyeglasses; Laser equipment designed for engraving and tinting optical lenses for eyeglasses; Lenses for sunglasses; Magnifying glasses; Magnifying glasses that fit on the user's face in the manner of eyeglasses; Nose guards which can be worn by attachment to eyewear such as sunglasses and ski goggles; Opera glasses; Optical devices, namely, eye pieces for helmet mounted displays; Optical frames; Optical glasses; Optical lenses; Optical readers; Polarizing spectacles; Protective eyeglasses; Protective eyewear; Protective eyewear and component parts thereof; Protective glasses; Protective spectacles; Reading eyeglasses; Reading glasses; Safety eyewear; Ski glasses; Spectacle cases; Spectacle frames; Spectacle frames made of metal and of synthetic material; Spectacle frames made of metal or a combination of metal and plastics; Spectacle frames made of metal or of a combination of metal and plastic; Spectacle glasses; Spectacle holders; Spectacle lens blanks; Spectacle lenses; Spectacles; Spectacles; Spectacles; Spectacles and sunglasses; Spectacles, frames and cases; Sports eyewear; Sports glasses; Sports' glasses; Sun glasses; Sunglass chains and cords; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses; Sunglasses and spectacles; Theatre glasses; Unmounted spectacle frames; Visual training aid, namely, non-prescription glasses used for visual training purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |