Drawing for I/O ANYWHERE

USPTO serial 77902194

I/O ANYWHERE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I/O ANYWHERE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Todd S. Sharinn

TODD S SHARINN GILBRIBE TUSA LAST & SPELLANE LLC31 BROOKSIDE DRIVEGREENWICH, CT 06830UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009High density enclosures for computer servers and computer equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 10, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 26, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 31, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 4, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 4, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 4, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 4, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 1, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 1, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 6, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 23, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Apr 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance